Laser-Ion Acceleration

Lecture 1 – What accelerates particles?

1. How do we accelerate a particle?

In mechanics we usually talk about acceleration, but for a particle accelerator the more relevant question is: how do we increase the kinetic energy of a charged particle? In other words, we do not primarily “accelerate”, we energize.

The starting point is Newton's second law, \( \mathbf{a} = \mathrm{d}\mathbf{v}/\mathrm{d}t = \mathbf{F}/m \). For a particle with charge \( q \) in an electric field \( \mathbf{E} \) we have \[ \frac{\mathrm{d}\mathbf{v}}{\mathrm{d}t} = \frac{\mathbf{F}}{m} = \frac{q}{m} \mathbf{E}. \] In a homogeneous field \( \mathbf{E} \), the motion is uniformly accelerated along the field direction.

The kinetic energy gain follows from the work done by the force: \[ W = \Delta E_{\text{kin}} = \int_A^B \mathbf{F} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{s} = q \int_A^B \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{s}. \] For a constant field between two electrodes, i.e. a parallel-plate capacitor, this simplifies to \[ \Delta E_{\text{kin}} = q U, \] where \( U \) is the potential difference between the plates. This motivates the electron volt as a convenient unit: 1 eV is the kinetic energy gained by an electron when it traverses a potential difference of 1 V.

Note that this relation continues to hold in the relativistic regime: the kinetic energy is then \[ E_{\text{kin}} = m c^2 (\gamma - 1), \qquad \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}, \] but the work done by the electric field is still \( q U \) between two electrodes.

Parallel-plate capacitor with voltage U0, a charge q inside the gap of length d_gap, and an arrow showing acceleration along the electric field.
Figure 1.1: Parallel-plate capacitor with gap length \( d_{\text{gap}} \) and applied voltage \( U_0 \). A charge \( q \) placed in the gap is accelerated by the homogeneous electric field and gains a kinetic energy \( \Delta E_{\text{kin}} = q U_0 \) when crossing the full potential difference.

2. Limits of constant-voltage (DC) accelerators

A straightforward way to energize charged particles is to build a very large DC voltage source and let the particles fall through the corresponding potential difference. This is the idea behind electrostatic accelerators such as the Van de Graaff generator and its tandem variants.

Robert J. Van de Graaff developed the belt-charged electrostatic high-voltage generator around 1930; his work was first widely reported in 1931, and larger machines followed within a few years. By the early 1930s, electrostatic accelerators reached hundreds of kilovolts to a few megavolts, and later up to about 10 MV using pressurized tanks with insulating gases such as SF\(_6\). These machines are still in use as precise low-energy ion accelerators.

The real limitation is not the mechanical design but the maximum breakdown field that the electrodes and the insulating medium can withstand. Above a certain electric field, microscopic surface irregularities, field emission and gas ionization trigger discharges that quench the field. Operating closer to this breakdown limit allows higher gradients but increases the probability of destructive sparks.

Side note: physical picture of breakdown

In gases, breakdown often starts with ionization of residual atoms by field-accelerated electrons, leading to an avalanche and a conducting plasma channel (Paschen-law-like behavior). In vacuum or at metal surfaces, breakdown tends to be initiated by microscopic field emitters and surface defects; local enhancements of the electric field lead to intense emission, heating and eventually the formation of a plasma arc.

Experiments show that the effective breakdown threshold depends on many factors: material, surface preparation, pulse length and frequency. Generally, higher-frequency RF structures can sustain significantly larger gradients than comparable DC setups, but there is no universal power law (such as a simple \(E_{\text{bd}} \propto f_0^n\)) that holds across all technologies.

3. Using AC voltages: a single RF gap

Technologically, high voltages are much easier to obtain with AC than with DC, because transformers efficiently step up AC voltages. This raises an important question: can we use an AC voltage to accelerate particles in a capacitor?

We consider the same parallel-plate geometry, now with a small exit aperture in the right-hand plate and a sinusoidal voltage \[ U(t) = U_0 \cos(2 \pi f_0 t) \] applied between the plates (Figure 1.2). The electric field between the plates is \[ E(t) = \frac{U(t)}{d_{\text{gap}}} = \frac{U_0}{d_{\text{gap}}} \cos(2 \pi f_0 t). \] A particle entering the gap with velocity \( v \) experiences an accelerating or decelerating field depending on the RF phase.

Transit-time condition

For effective acceleration, the field should not change sign while the particle is inside the gap. A simple estimate for the transit time is \[ t_{\text{cross}} \approx \frac{d_{\text{gap}}}{v}. \] The RF field reverses after half a period, \( T_0/2 = 1/(2 f_0) \). Requiring \( t_{\text{cross}} \lesssim T_0/2 \) yields the transit-time condition \[ d_{\text{gap}} \lesssim \frac{v}{2 f_0}. \] If this condition is satisfied, the particle reaches the exit aperture before the field reverses and leaves the capacitor with a net energy gain.

RF-driven capacitor with exit hole in the right plate, driven by a time-dependent voltage U(t); condition d_gap < v/(2 f0) indicated.
Figure 1.2: RF-driven parallel-plate capacitor with gap \( d_{\text{gap}} \), exit aperture and applied voltage \( U(t) \). If \( d_{\text{gap}} < v/(2 f_0) \), the particle reaches the exit before the field reverses and is effectively accelerated.

Even with RF voltages, however, we cannot raise \( U_0 \) to arbitrarily large values. Breakdown and power limitations still constrain the maximum field in a single gap. To reach higher energies we therefore need to reuse the same RF source in many gaps in series.

4. Widerøe structure: many gaps and drift tubes

Rolf Widerøe proposed an elegant way to re-use an RF voltage for many acceleration steps. Metallic drift tubes shield the particle between the gaps, and the RF phase is adjusted such that each gap provides an accelerating kick (Figure 1.3). Historically, the Widerøe linac predates Lawrence's cyclotron but is closely related in spirit: in both cases the same RF source is used repeatedly while the particle energy increases.

Drift tubes and phase advance

Inside a drift tube the field is essentially zero and the particle moves at (approximately) constant velocity \( v \). The time the particle spends inside a given tube is \[ t_{\text{drift}} \approx \frac{d_{\text{drift}}}{v}, \] where \( d_{\text{drift}} \) is the tube length. While the particle is shielded, the RF field can change sign and prepare the next gap with the correct accelerating polarity. For the particle to arrive at the next gap in phase with the accelerating field, the drift time should be about half an RF period, or an odd multiple of it: \[ t_{\text{drift}} \approx \frac{1}{2 f_0}, \; \frac{3}{2 f_0}, \; \frac{5}{2 f_0},\;\ldots \] This translates into drift-tube lengths \[ d_{\text{drift}} \approx \frac{v}{2 f_0}, \; \frac{3 v}{2 f_0}, \; \frac{5 v}{2 f_0},\;\ldots \] In practice one typically chooses the shortest solution \( d_{\text{drift}} \approx v/(2 f_0) \) for a compact accelerator and lets the tubes become longer as the particle velocity increases.

Wideroe linear accelerator with several drift tubes of increasing length and gaps in between; odd tubes at ground, even tubes at RF potential.
Figure 1.3: Widerøe linear accelerator. A sequence of drift tubes with increasing length is separated by short gaps. Odd-numbered tubes are at ground, even-numbered tubes are driven by \( U(t) \). The drift-tube length is chosen such that \( d_{\text{drift}} \approx v/(2 f_0) \) (or \( 3 v/(2 f_0), 5 v/(2 f_0), \ldots \)), so that the particle always reaches the next gap in the accelerating RF phase.

In principle, we can now obtain arbitrarily high particle energies by adding more gaps and drift tubes. The total length of the accelerator then scales with the number of gaps and with the characteristic drift-tube length \( d_{\text{drift}} \). For ultra-relativistic particles with \( v \approx c \) this length has a simple lower bound: \[ d_{\text{drift}}^{\text{min}} \approx \frac{c}{2 f_0}. \] If we think in terms of electromagnetic waves rather than voltages, this is just half a free-space wavelength, \[ d_{\text{drift}}^{\text{min}} = \frac{\lambda}{2}, \qquad \lambda = \frac{c}{f_0}. \] This shows immediately how to make linear accelerators more compact: increase the RF frequency, i.e. decrease the wavelength.

5. Frequencies, wavelengths and the evolution of accelerators

Historically, the available technology for generating strong electromagnetic fields has evolved towards higher frequencies:

In terms of our simple drift-tube scaling \( d_{\text{drift}}^{\text{min}} \approx \lambda/2 \), this evolution means that the characteristic length scale of accelerating structures has shrunk from meters (radio frequencies) to centimeters (microwaves) and potentially to micrometers (optical and near-infrared lasers). The central theme of this lecture series is how to exploit these extremely high laser fields to build compact, laser-driven accelerators, in particular for ion acceleration in plasmas.

6. Interactive Widerøe accelerator simulator

The following interactive module, lecture01_wideroe_simulator.html, illustrates the concepts of RF gaps, transit time and drift tubes: